4 ms·
The issue is that servers that go in a datacenter have multiple constraints, not just one. Computational speed, RAM capacity, networking, amount of power used,
by shrubble 3y ago
The issue is that servers that go in a datacenter have multiple constraints, not just one.
Computational speed, RAM capacity, networking, amount of power used, all play a part.
For instance, say a RISCV 1024-core multi-chiplet CPU with ability to have 4TB on the motherboard; even if it used 400W for the CPU, it might make sense because of how many VMs you could pack per-system. For datacenter it sometimes may make sense to talk about how "wide" rather than how "deep" you can go, especially for cloud or VM tasks. Each core being slightly slower might not matter, in that you have a lot of concurrent tasks that may well be disk or network IO-bound part of the time...
- hajile 3y agoIntel pairing up with SiFive shows the obvious path forward here where the new ISA is paired with existing tech from a large company. If Intel decided to ship a core that could execute either x86 or RISC-V instructions, we could see massive adoption in no time at all.