3 ms·
This is the exact thing I was looking for for a long time. I'm gonna use it to provide a browser inside the Safari on Apple devices. This allows me to use exten
by Aerbil313 3y ago
This is the exact thing I was looking for for a long time. I'm gonna use it to provide a browser inside the Safari on Apple devices. This allows me to use extensions which cannot be changed by the client, specificially my planned GPT productivity extension:
- Don't allow the user to browse social media websites like Hackernews.
- keepamovin 3y agoYou’ll need to port the extension to a custom content script and add it in tho: the reason is that we running headless, so we don’t support extensions out of the box. I’ve had plans for shimming the extension API for a long time. I think it’ll be a cool project, but there hasn’t been that much demand for it! Tho I think we should probably do it tho.
- Aerbil313 3y agoThanks, luckily I didn’t yet write my extension.
- keepamovin 3y agoWell, come on over to https://github.com/dosyago/BrowserBoxPro https://github.com/dosyago/BrowserBoxPro maybe we can get started with like an `extensions/` subfolder or something to collect these? What do you think, not interesting to you? :)
- Aerbil313 3y agoWell I have some other things in my hand rn, but I'm determined to do it because there's no other way to achieve what I want in mobile. A few weeks later, probably. I'd recommend shimming the fundamental Chrome Extension APIs too, like those for DOM manipulation and web requests. This would support a great number of Chrome extensions.
- keepamovin 3y agoYes! I think that's such a cool idea. I will add an issue for it, if you know anyone interested in doing that work, would it be a bad idea if you try to corral them?
- keepamovin 3y agoIssue added! :) https://github.com/dosyago/BrowserBoxPro/issues/242 https://github.com/dosyago/BrowserBoxPro/issues/242
- Aerbil313 3y agoNo, sorry. Might do it myself, though not now as I said.
- keepamovin 3y agoDude that would be awesome! But it would be a lot of work…