3 ms·
Xe's. And as a response to your previous comment, it's not preference so much as completely ignoring someone's personality and instead assuming one based on som
by stefncb 3y ago
Xe's. And as a response to your previous comment, it's not preference so much as completely ignoring someone's personality and instead assuming one based on some stereotype. And I'm sorry if that upsets you but you can't "prefer" to ignore someone because of gender or personality; I thought humans already concluded that's not a Good Thing. Get over yourself.
- bowsamic 3y agoTo me this comment seems far more rude and aggressive than anything I said. Liberal tolerance in action?
- stefncb 3y agoHuman empathy in action.
- bowsamic 3y agoEmpathy is being rude and mean?
- stefncb 3y agoI'm aware I was mean and maybe that wasn't right, so I'm genuinely sorry for that. My point stands anyway.
- burnished 3y agoAnyone trying to guilt you with 'liberal tolerance' is not arguing in good faith.
- stefncb 3y agoI'm aware, but I'll take the criticism. Arguments are almost always better without being aggressive or mean. The liberal tolerance thing was obviously crap.
- burnished 3y agoI should have stated this outright; I don't think you were being aggressive or mean at all. You very clearly laid out that they were not in fact establishing a preference, and genuinely 'getting over yourself' is the only course of action when people are genuinely feeling discomfort from seeing people unlike them. Thats what I mean, I don't think the criticism is at all valid
- stefncb 3y agoThanks.