>But to know that, one has to understand what the data means semantically. And our current AIs ... well, don't. Another wrong statement, you're on a roll today

>But to know that, one has to understand what the data means semantically. And our current AIs ... well, don't. Another wrong statement, you're on a roll today. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11169 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11169 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12672 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12672 There's a word we would use to describe your confidently erroneous statements were it one of the outputs an LLM. Wonder what that might be..