2 ms·

If I decide I don’t want my life in Texas and, for whatever reason, there are better opportunities in Mexico (much better beaches, for example), I should be abl

If I decide I don’t want my life in Texas and, for whatever reason, there are better opportunities in Mexico (much better beaches, for example), I should be able to just trek down from Texas and the Mexican people should have to fund my trek and receive me with open arms? Whatever needs to be the case to where my life is better in Mexico, let’s just grant it, like maybe I’m in incel in Texas but not in Mexico where I can start a family with a BBL latina. Bonus if I have to trek through the deserts of Chihuahua because it’s risky? You’re acting like this is obvious to everyone rather than the center of massive controversy.

pavlov 3y ago
Sure, it’s a massive controversy. But neither is it a foregone conclusion that public funds should be spent on rescuing billionaires who signed a waiver indicating they understood the risks of taking a dangerous pleasure trip on an uncertified vessel. Some of those who cross the Mediterranean in flimsy boats are adventurers, maybe not so different from the passengers of the Titan. Many others are children and adults trying to escape genuine threats to their lives, and they’d be entitled to refugee protection. Personally I don’t think we should sacrifice the latter to dissuade the former.