3 ms·

Less bad = good?

• ta1243 3y ago
  Well the best thing you can personally do for the environment is probably to kill yourself, that would reduce the environmental damage you cause in future to near-zero More grandiose plans would be somehow triggering a nuclear war - making mankind extinct would be great for the environment in the long run. Not many people can do that, but I guess if you work hard you might get into such a position. Assuming you don't want to do that, reducing human impact on the environment is of course good.
  • tcfhgj 3y ago
    What if it isn't reducing the human impact? Jevons paradox
  • 11235813213455 3y ago
    or make a food forest, permaculture, that's one of the rare non-destructive activities or minimize your impact, for example my footprint is about 1/20th of average, if more people lived like that, global warming wouldn't be an issue at all there are many possibilities between 0 (no human) and 1 (many homo consumericus)