3 ms·

It is their market but they don't have any significant participation in it, which is why regulation is easy. There isn't any significant downside to it for them

It is their market but they don't have any significant participation in it, which is why regulation is easy. There isn't any significant downside to it for them. I don't have beef with BMW, that was just an example. "Don't drive a BMW" is the equivalent of "Don't buy an iPhone" if you care about repairability. It shouldn't be like that.

jacquesm 3y ago
You see correlation and infer causation but maybe the better way to see this is to realize that the EU is large, has a ton of work on their plate already and relatively limited budget to work with whereas manufacturers will always just see how far they can stretch it. The number of EU companies affected by EU regulations is far larger than the number of companies from abroad. Your example fails because the same amount of regulation that applies to EU car manufacturers also applies to manufacturers from abroad. The EU is in that sense one of the fairest players. According to your philosophy no amount of regulation on mobile phones would be acceptable because the EU has no big name phone manufacturer any more. But as others have already pointed out this legislation affects far more than just mobile phones so your argument simply fails.
- systemtest 3y ago
  The EU has time to responds to Apple rumours so it appears they have time to crack down on BMW, Mercedes and many other EU brands that limit user repairability.
  - jacquesm 3y ago
    So, you want them to target BMW, Mercedes and other EU brands rather than to address all of the car manufacturers in the same way? That's exactly the kind of thing they don't do, and for good reasons. As you can see from the link posted above they do a lot to ensure right to repair, but it isn't perfect. Give it some time.
Levitz 3y ago
Consumers are the whole reason as to why any market exists. You can think about regulation as "You have to do this to sell here" but also as "They have to do that for you to buy it here". The EU comes in agreement as to what kind of products they ought to purchase and this is the result. Your wallet is not the only way to vote in modern capitalism.

jacquesm 3y ago

You see correlation and infer causation but maybe the better way to see this is to realize that the EU is large, has a ton of work on their plate already and relatively limited budget to work with whereas manufacturers will always just see how far they can stretch it. The number of EU companies affected by EU regulations is far larger than the number of companies from abroad. Your example fails because the same amount of regulation that applies to EU car manufacturers also applies to manufacturers from abroad. The EU is in that sense one of the fairest players. According to your philosophy no amount of regulation on mobile phones would be acceptable because the EU has no big name phone manufacturer any more. But as others have already pointed out this legislation affects far more than just mobile phones so your argument simply fails.

systemtest 3y ago
The EU has time to responds to Apple rumours so it appears they have time to crack down on BMW, Mercedes and many other EU brands that limit user repairability.
- jacquesm 3y ago
  So, you want them to target BMW, Mercedes and other EU brands rather than to address all of the car manufacturers in the same way? That's exactly the kind of thing they don't do, and for good reasons. As you can see from the link posted above they do a lot to ensure right to repair, but it isn't perfect. Give it some time.

Levitz 3y ago

Consumers are the whole reason as to why any market exists. You can think about regulation as "You have to do this to sell here" but also as "They have to do that for you to buy it here". The EU comes in agreement as to what kind of products they ought to purchase and this is the result. Your wallet is not the only way to vote in modern capitalism.