3 ms·
> as having no objective ties to Nazi ideologies. While you deny that If you go back and read what I said, I said: > what is the evidence either of them is a
by skissane 3y ago
> as having no objective ties to Nazi ideologies. While you deny that
If you go back and read what I said, I said:
> what is the evidence either of them is a "nazi sympathizer"?
That's not denying anything. That's simply asking what the evidence is.
When asking what the evidence for an assertion is gets the response:
> This is not good faith, and screams as neonazi apologism.
I don't think we are engaging in rational discussion any more. Continued engagement is pointless.
- rewmie 3y ago[flagged]
- skissane 3y ago[flagged]
- DonHopkins 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoPlease don't perpetuate flamewars. This is also in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
- skissane 3y agoSorry, you are right I should have stopped responding to them. It is hard to resist the urge, but I should have.