3 ms·
Your comparison with Conway's Game of Life is interesting, since that's inherently local. More importantly, I'm skeptical towards non-locality because it is an
by dgfl 3y ago
Your comparison with Conway's Game of Life is interesting, since that's inherently local.
More importantly, I'm skeptical towards non-locality because it is an extremely strong assumption with very weak effects: the only place it really shows up is in post-correlations between measurements of previously entangled systems, which notably cannot transfer any information faster than light (in fact, they require classical communication to even be noticed).
Moreover, the only way to get entangled systems in the first place is through local interactions.
By believing in non-local hidden variables you get a deterministic universe with a mysterious, otherwise undetectable ether that instantaneously notifies quantum entities that they should update their behavior.
By not believing in them, you get rid of the only n
on-local "phenomenon" in physics (really, more of an interpretation) but you have to accept that some things are fundamentally random.
Easy choice, if you ask me (or most of the physics community).