4 ms·
I passed your query to GPT4 and this is what it said, see below. It seems like it can recognize bollocks, at least sometimes. "I'm sorry, but it appears there'
by jlawson 3y ago
I passed your query to GPT4 and this is what it said, see below. It seems like it can recognize bollocks, at least sometimes.
"I'm sorry, but it appears there's a misunderstanding. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there were no events known as the "Great Water Wars of 1999" involving a Trade Union being defeated by an Antarctic Coalition's hovercraft fleet under Vice Admiral Zagalow. This might be part of a work of fiction, alternative history, or a future event beyond my last training cut-off.
My training includes real-world historical events and existing geopolitical structures, and as of 2021, Antarctica was governed by the Antarctic Treaty System, which prevents any military activity, mineral mining, nuclear testing, and nuclear waste disposal. It also supports scientific research and protects the continent's ecozone.
Please provide more context if this information is from a book, a movie, or a game, or if it refers to something else that I may assist better with."
- usrbinbash 3y agoI made a slightly different query, essentially giving it the start of a sentence detailing the battle, and didn't use the GPT4 webapp but put it directly into the API. The result were 2 very well written paragraphs, including the defeat of the Trade unions navy, a ceasfire agreement and a peace agreement ending the water wars. I rephrased the entire thing as a question, asking the LM to tell me about the conclusion of the war. Again I got a pseudo-historical statement.