> you need a small qualified team That's the problem. > I once pitched an off-the-shelf program to a corporate, which would have cost 10k to roll out company

> you need a small qualified team That's the problem. > I once pitched an off-the-shelf program to a corporate, which would have cost 10k to roll out company wide. $10k, plus the effort to actually deploy, train, etc. And what happens if you need to roll back? What criteria are you checking against? So many questions. > Better that than letting someone later claim that 10k was wasted. Listen, I don't disagree with the idea of small, qualified teams being great. But I've also seen a good number of people who think they are qualified push things through that were really just bad ideas. This comes from smart people, too. Smart at what they do, but not at the specific thing they are trying to get done. It's just outside of their wheelhouse. > Which brings us back to well resourced, small teams, of competent people. Yep. Easier said than done.