> . that they won't have enough renewable energy to produce zero-emission e-fuels/hydrogen at a scale big enough to achieve reasonable consumer prices for usage

> . that they won't have enough renewable energy to produce zero-emission e-fuels/hydrogen at a scale big enough to achieve reasonable consumer prices for usage in cars. which then means that "everyone" is still using ICE cars, which can't be driven climate neutral. The the lobby will again cry that it is impossible that we move everything to electric instantly and/or e fuels can't be afforded by the poorest. The result will be that climate goals regarding ICE cars will be watered down again, and the government will subsidize e fuels. Regarding food: just kill more rein forests in brasil, which we are already doing anywasys (we produce bio gas from plants (1/30 area efficiency of photovoltaics while eroding the ground) and add bio fuel already to fossil fuels (which btw. hardly improves the impact on the environnment -> a bit less theoretical emissions while way more air pollution)