2 ms·
> Second observation was that the regime did not exist in the moment: with few notable exceptions, we have not even seen faces of anyone from national security
by ranger207 3y ago
> Second observation was that the regime did not exist in the moment: with few notable exceptions, we have not even seen faces of anyone from national security council. Some local actions of the governors, fortification of Moscow, pathetic speech of Putin in the morning and that’s it. The weakness of it in the face of a violent force was exposed.
This is, in my experience, actually a good indication that the event was truly a surprise to the Russian government. Their media apparatus is very good at having a cohesive narrative and lots of talking points in place before planned information operations, and they're not typically great at responding to events on the ground as they unfold, usually needing a couple of days to assemble a media campaign in response to unexpected events. The lack of any coordinated information response is a tell that the Russian government didn't anticipate this whole shebang.
- soonnow 3y agoAnders Puck Nielsen talks about this in his video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jabKKr3pstU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jabKKr3pstU According to him the hallmarks of a Russian Flag operation are 1. Bad production quality and a clear message 2. Intense media coverage in Russia 3. Positive message about the Russian state Literally none of these points were apparent here. It shows a weak Russian state, was covered only as so far as necessary and what the message would be was completely unclear. Don't hire mercenaries?