4 ms·

Amazed at such headlines, they seem to show up every time Microsoft launches their new OS. It is always the same.

___Calv_Dee___ 15y ago
Sure there may have been a lot of expectations and some hype for new up and coming Windows releases but this will be the first time that Microsoft will be providing such an overhauled (design and function) OS available across mobile and desktop. It's a necessity for Microsoft to get the platform integration right in order to stand a chance against the wonderfully integrated ecosystem model Apple has really set a standard for. This is definitely, in my opinion, far from "the same". http://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/why-windows-8-is-microsofts-most-vital-launch-in-years/ http://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/why-windows-8-is-microsofts-mos...
georgemcbay 15y ago
The content is just as shaky as the headline, IMO. FTA: "Windows XP was an updated but essentially similar experience to Windows 95, Windows Vista was an attempt to correct XP’s security issues but turned into a joke of its own, and Windows 7 was what Vista should have been yet failed to inspire." XP was a pretty huge deal to anyone who wasn't already running Windows 2000 (which is almost everyone). It was the first consumer release built on the NT kernel and was incredibly more stable than previous consumer Windows releases. It may be hard to remember at this point, but XP was a huge game changer for the average user... a brave new world where a Windows app could crash without bringing down the whole OS to a blue screen! I don't really get the Windows 7 slight. Windows 7 was a huge success, both in terms of actual adoption and critical praise. I also found the lack of mention of Microsoft's very successful 64-bit transition (IMO this is a very undervalued aspect of Vista, though Windows 7 carried it forward to the larger masses) a huge oversight here.

Sure there may have been a lot of expectations and some hype for new up and coming Windows releases but this will be the first time that Microsoft will be providing such an overhauled (design and function) OS available across mobile and desktop. It's a necessity for Microsoft to get the platform integration right in order to stand a chance against the wonderfully integrated ecosystem model Apple has really set a standard for. This is definitely, in my opinion, far from "the same". http://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/why-windows-8-is-microsofts-most-vital-launch-in-years/ http://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/why-windows-8-is-microsofts-mos...

georgemcbay 15y ago

The content is just as shaky as the headline, IMO. FTA: "Windows XP was an updated but essentially similar experience to Windows 95, Windows Vista was an attempt to correct XP’s security issues but turned into a joke of its own, and Windows 7 was what Vista should have been yet failed to inspire." XP was a pretty huge deal to anyone who wasn't already running Windows 2000 (which is almost everyone). It was the first consumer release built on the NT kernel and was incredibly more stable than previous consumer Windows releases. It may be hard to remember at this point, but XP was a huge game changer for the average user... a brave new world where a Windows app could crash without bringing down the whole OS to a blue screen! I don't really get the Windows 7 slight. Windows 7 was a huge success, both in terms of actual adoption and critical praise. I also found the lack of mention of Microsoft's very successful 64-bit transition (IMO this is a very undervalued aspect of Vista, though Windows 7 carried it forward to the larger masses) a huge oversight here.