4 ms·

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/04/26/the-weird-but-hopeful-politics-of-a-carbon-tax/ https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/04/26/the-weird-but-hopef... https:

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/04/26/the-weird-but-hopeful-politics-of-a-carbon-tax/ https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/04/26/the-weird-but-hopef... https://time.com/5447748/washington-state-carbon-tax-climate-change/ https://time.com/5447748/washington-state-carbon-tax-climate... https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/carbon-tax-climate-change-environmentalists-1052210 https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/carbon-tax-climate... EDIT: To provide context on why the Left finds carbon taxes dubious, it’s that carbon taxes are very likely regressive. That is, they are though to hit poorer people harder: https://www.nber.org/digest/jan10/how-regressive-price-carbon https://www.nber.org/digest/jan10/how-regressive-price-carbo... I agree, but I think this is an example of the perfect being the enemy of the good. We can craft companion policies that lessen the regressive nature of carbon taxes, while still maintaining the benefits of carbon taxes. Also, please address my main point about the environmental Left’s rabid opposition to nuclear power over the last 40 years.

anonymouskimmer 3y ago
Can you highlight polls or some other data source showing that the "environmental Left" is rabidly opposed to nuclear power? The best current poll reporting I can find don't distinguish beyond major political party: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/23/americans-continue-to-express-mixed-views-about-nuclear-power/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/23/americans... You're also mentioning their opposition over the last 40 years, yet not comparing it to the latest and greatest nuclear power plants. Presumably many people are unaware of advances in nuclear power technology. Edit to add: Thirdly, if the rabid environmental Left is opposed to nuclear power, I'd expect them to also be opposed to most of consumerism for other reasons (such as the environmental impacts of resource extraction). If they believe necessary power can be had from non-nuclear, non-carbon-intensive power plants (such as wind or solar), then to support nuclear power would be basically supporting the continuation of a consumerism that they generally see as bad for the environment. To only take greenhouse gas emissions seriously when rabid environmental Leftists completely change their worldview seems counter-productive. You have to take it on its own evidentiary basis.
ZeroGravitas 3y ago
None of those links support your claim. > “This aversion to taxes in the U.S. is high and should not be underestimated,” Yeah, the environmental left really hate taxes. > AOC tweeted in 2019 that “carbon tax or cap-and-trade … could be part of a solution [but] they are inadequate as the whole answer Not thinking something is the sole answer is not the same as not supporting it. If it was then I (and AOC) don't support any climate policy because we support at least 2. Several of them talk about carbon taxes being voted down by the general population, so unless you think the "environmental left" have a majority support that doesn't matter. I'm also sick of the yellow vest protest being mispreresented: > The movement was initially motivated by rising crude oil and fuel prices, a high cost of living, and economic inequality. The movement argued that a disproportionate burden of taxation in France was falling on the working and middle classes,[71][72][73] especially in rural and peri-urban areas.[32][74] The protesters called for lower fuel taxes, a reintroduction of the solidarity tax on wealth, a minimum wage increase,[39] among other things. People seem really keen to skip over all the inequality bits that fed into it, taking the sole lesson that "you can't tax carbon" which is only really true in the US. France is part of the EU's carbon trading scheme. It already taxes carbon.

anonymouskimmer 3y ago

Can you highlight polls or some other data source showing that the "environmental Left" is rabidly opposed to nuclear power? The best current poll reporting I can find don't distinguish beyond major political party: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/23/americans-continue-to-express-mixed-views-about-nuclear-power/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/23/americans... You're also mentioning their opposition over the last 40 years, yet not comparing it to the latest and greatest nuclear power plants. Presumably many people are unaware of advances in nuclear power technology. Edit to add: Thirdly, if the rabid environmental Left is opposed to nuclear power, I'd expect them to also be opposed to most of consumerism for other reasons (such as the environmental impacts of resource extraction). If they believe necessary power can be had from non-nuclear, non-carbon-intensive power plants (such as wind or solar), then to support nuclear power would be basically supporting the continuation of a consumerism that they generally see as bad for the environment. To only take greenhouse gas emissions seriously when rabid environmental Leftists completely change their worldview seems counter-productive. You have to take it on its own evidentiary basis.

ZeroGravitas 3y ago

None of those links support your claim. > “This aversion to taxes in the U.S. is high and should not be underestimated,” Yeah, the environmental left really hate taxes. > AOC tweeted in 2019 that “carbon tax or cap-and-trade … could be part of a solution [but] they are inadequate as the whole answer Not thinking something is the sole answer is not the same as not supporting it. If it was then I (and AOC) don't support any climate policy because we support at least 2. Several of them talk about carbon taxes being voted down by the general population, so unless you think the "environmental left" have a majority support that doesn't matter. I'm also sick of the yellow vest protest being mispreresented: > The movement was initially motivated by rising crude oil and fuel prices, a high cost of living, and economic inequality. The movement argued that a disproportionate burden of taxation in France was falling on the working and middle classes,[71][72][73] especially in rural and peri-urban areas.[32][74] The protesters called for lower fuel taxes, a reintroduction of the solidarity tax on wealth, a minimum wage increase,[39] among other things. People seem really keen to skip over all the inequality bits that fed into it, taking the sole lesson that "you can't tax carbon" which is only really true in the US. France is part of the EU's carbon trading scheme. It already taxes carbon.