2 ms·
>> "even NASA" implies that NASA is the objective paragon of software development. Sure. They have some of the highest costs of failure post-deployment of anyo
by phkahler 3y ago
>> "even NASA" implies that NASA is the objective paragon of software development.
Sure. They have some of the highest costs of failure post-deployment of anyone, and they have some solid development practices. I'll cite NASA in this context any time. Feel free to pull in other sources if you don't like them though.
- flaminHotSpeedo 3y agoI never said or implied they have poor development practices. But the constraints, requirements, and priorities for a given project at NASA won't even be the same as every other project there, let alone projects at pretty companies in different fields. By extension, I would argue that the concept of universally superior development best practices as a whole doesn't make sense.