> 3d printers are the shitty version of replicators. That's fair. I was thinking of the ability to work with arbitrary matter as a fundamental change rather th

> 3d printers are the shitty version of replicators. That's fair. I was thinking of the ability to work with arbitrary matter as a fundamental change rather than incremental improvement, but I can see the point. > This is not a trivial problem to solve. Of course not, and if I implied such, I apologize. > things get really weird and capitalism probably breaks a lot of people and/or itself. Probably, property only really makes sense in a world with scarcity. Which is why intellectual property always seemed weird to me.