The goal of that kind of project in a huge tech org is to have capability in-house. So that they can play that game if they have to. Seems like they don't see

The goal of that kind of project in a huge tech org is to have capability in-house. So that they can play that game if they have to. Seems like they don't see themselves in a situation where their position without the tech would be worse than with the tech deployed. In some ways it's a bit like defense spending in a way, the most successful defensive army is the one strong enough to never get tested (in many other ways it's not)