3 ms·
I would guess that “too dangerous” is both hype and also means it utters insensitive statements. Not that it’s primed to topple human society.
by eloisius 3y ago
I would guess that “too dangerous” is both hype and also means it utters insensitive statements. Not that it’s primed to topple human society.
- 111111IIIIIII 3y agoThis is the only thing that makes sense.
- ChildOfChaos 3y agoWhat do you mean it 'utters insensitive statements', this is not a chat bot, it's text to speech, it generates speech for exactly what you type in, the threat is that it can be trained to sound like exactly anyone and the potential for fake news etc is high. The trouble is, this is already partly here and going to be increasingly available. For smaller startups that already do this like ElevenLabs, they have no reason to hold back, as it's there entire business, Meta can for now, but it's a fruitless exercise. These tools are coming. Meta doesn't want the flack hurting or causing investigations into it's current business is more what it means, it will release the tool when others have released there's and it will no longer be the one to blame.
- ChildOfChaos 3y ago'Utters insensitive statements' is clearly the domain of humans, checking on my threads and I realise what an ass I sound like, I didn't mean to be so combative with it. Apologies.
- flangola7 3y agoThe FBI warning about malicious communication using loved ones' voices is very damning.
- throwaway14356 3y agothe post love age