3 ms·
Because there must be a coordinated effort to change the default or at least increase the diversity of layouts. Otherwise it's like teaching esperanto, putting
by paulryanrogers 3y ago
Because there must be a coordinated effort to change the default or at least increase the diversity of layouts. Otherwise it's like teaching esperanto, putting them into a very small minority for little benefit.
Even as a technical user for decades I find it too burdensome to swim upstream with a niche layout, and I already have remapped copy-paste.
- _c3ag 3y agowell, all we can do, is all we can do… if swimming upstream is that hard (and i agree that decades of professional usage on a X layout is hard to give up); at least when teaching someone you could say something: “here is the layout you should use! i know mine is different and i can type typewriter with one row in case i want to impress someone but yours is better, like minor chances of getting a RSI and general efficiency when typing stuff…”
- paulryanrogers 3y agoFWIW I did try an alt layout a while back. It was just too disruptive because it required changing so many shortcuts. As more jobs come to benefit from shortcuts, QWERTY becomes more entrenched.