3 ms·
I think this is meant to be the IBM / RHEL antidote licence in spirit. Makes sense. However, it isn't clear what should / would happen if the website you host y
by osigurdson 3y ago
I think this is meant to be the IBM / RHEL antidote licence in spirit. Makes sense. However, it isn't clear what should / would happen if the website you host your code on disappears. Would tricksters at IBM simply claim that their website which hosts the code has been undergoing maintenance for a year? At the other end of the spectrum, would litigious slime sue a maintainer if github is down for 5 minutes? "Publicly available" probably needs more rigorous legal definition.
- phkahler 3y ago>> I think this is meant to be the IBM / RHEL antidote licence in spirit. Makes sense. You mean RH only releasing source to paying customers who have agreed though other arrangements not to share it? That's a GPL violation waiting for a court case.