10 ms·
> A human is not considered derivative work of the original works they used for training. No one has forced you to use humans as a comparison. A human is a cit
by pessimizer 3y ago
> A human is not considered derivative work of the original works they used for training.
No one has forced you to use humans as a comparison. A human is a citizen with other rights, and can own its own copyrights. Yet, you can still sue one for singing a song in front of other people. There were years of cinema that were distorted by the inability to have characters sing "Happy Birthday" to each other.
edit: Suddenly, fair use now covers the ability to reproduce copyrighted material almost verbatim, but only when the new method to do so takes tens of millions of dollars of computer time to take advantage of.
- circuit10 3y agoAI models don't always copy things verbatim. Clearly if they do and then you use that it's copyright infringement, but Google isn't illegal just because you can search for code that's under a license agreement (not that AI models are search engines). Then again, you can't download Google's index, but you also can't for many AI models... there's a lot of nuance here, I don't think it's clear one way or the other