3 ms·
Ignoring the fact that many of the corner crossing cases were bad faith arguments by landowners intentionally attempting to abuse the situation, I don't think a
by flaminHotSpeedo 3y ago
Ignoring the fact that many of the corner crossing cases were bad faith arguments by landowners intentionally attempting to abuse the situation, I don't think anyone would argue that the park boundary is a prism that extends vertically to infinity.
So where do you draw the line?
- jrockway 3y agoIt definitely extends to infinity. Why would it stop somewhere?
- zerocrates 3y agoWhy wouldn't it? If you think most people would consider a satellite passing overhead, an airplane flying high overhead, the Moon, the Sun, other objects in space etc. when directly overhead to be "in" a park, I think you'd be mistaken. And the results here bear that out, at least to the limited extent there were relevant questions. Similarly a subway train passing underneath the park is not "in" the park, nor are vehicles that are at the antipode of the park on the polar opposite side of the Earth.
- flaminHotSpeedo 3y agoSo you're saying that, for parks in there right location, for brief periods of time, parts of other plants, stars, and space are "part of the park"