3 ms·
By the same logic, wouldn't rollerblades also not carry people (and by extension, not be vehicles)? Rollerblades, skis, snowboards, skateboards, scooters, bike
by Qwertious 3y ago
By the same logic, wouldn't rollerblades also not carry people (and by extension, not be vehicles)?
Rollerblades, skis, snowboards, skateboards, scooters, bikes.
IMO the definition of a vehicle comes down to how wieldy, how large, and how powerful the device is - for instance car is obviously a vehicle as it's very powerful, has a large turning radius, and large area. The interesting thing about this is that there's an argument that scooters are not vehicles but skateboards are - scooters are far easier to control (i.e. more wieldy) whereas skateboards have a tendency to launch the user in one direction and the skateboard in the other, which makes it rather unwieldy.
- whelp_24 3y agoI would argue it's able mechanical advantage. Everything you listed is a vehicle. Also, skateboards are far more agile than scooters when used by people who know how to ride them. Scooters are just easier for novices. I would only consider skates to be slightly ambiguous because they are shoes that are mounted but worn. but still, i say vehicle