3 ms·
The game was pretty clear that the question was not if it "should be allowed to violate the rule", but if it violates the rule in the first place.
by mbork_pl 3y ago
The game was pretty clear that the question was not if it "should be allowed to violate the rule", but if it violates the rule in the first place.
- arrrg 3y agoDoes something violate the rule if it’s allowed based on common sense? I don’t think so.
- emodendroket 3y agoLots of people are in jail or fired after following that logic.
- arrrg 3y agoAnd some people who didn’t follow that logic allowed millions of people to be killed. This all ain’t easy.
- aerio 3y agoObviously, it does. The rule says "No vehicles in the park" and tells you specifically not to moralize , justify, or apply local laws.
- arrrg 3y agoIt does not tell me not to moralize. It just tells me to not take any other rules into account that might exist, i.e. to not construct a legalistic argument. But I don’t need to to allow ambulances. I think this is the core of what many engineers fundamentally don’t get about rules and laws in society? The framing of the rules clearly places this rule firmly in the real world, in a real park.
- Lio 3y agoDepends on the definition of "common sense". I've heard it said that common sense is just what naive people assume is obvious. I'm not sure about that but I do know that people often disagree on what is and isn't common sense. I guess this is why English Common Law works. We use precedence to argue about how the words of the law should be interpreted and at least try to flush out ambiguity.