> I was making the argument that you made an assumption that didnt hold any weight. I claimed multiple things. Unless you think the single assumption being wr

> I was making the argument that you made an assumption that didnt hold any weight. I claimed multiple things. Unless you think the single assumption being wrong in magnitude (I still maintain the majority of their customers were American) completely upends the entire thesis, then you're trying to treat this as some counterexample which... doesn't work here. > Slack does a lot of things, but its UX is actually pretty piss poor due to the bolt-ons (threads is just about the worst implementation I have ever seen), walled garden, weird account things (magic links~ if you want to see your other workspaces make sure you use the same email everywhere!), security (goodbye decent realtime bot api) and the client which feels slow despite using more resources than it should given its status as a program that needs to always be running. I'm not discussing the UX here I'm trying to talk about what Slack is doing differently than AIM.