It's an argument I encounter way too often in discussions (politics, climate, evolution even) with people who have an "alternative" view of how things work: it

It's an argument I encounter way too often in discussions (politics, climate, evolution even) with people who have an "alternative" view of how things work: it doesn't address everything, therefore it doesn't address anything. There's probably a name for that fallacy. People take all the issues that have been solved/addresses for granted, and pretend the unsolved issues are the only ones that matter. And because current methods don't fix those, they're clearly worthless and should be thrown out.