3 ms·

I see the argument, but I would disagree. Arch moves fast, but that's about all that it really feels like it has in common with Fedora to me. I suppose that's

I see the argument, but I would disagree. Arch moves fast, but that's about all that it really feels like it has in common with Fedora to me. I suppose that's really a matter of taste though,

Shared404 3y ago
Have some time now, so can elaborate further. Yum/DNF are _extremely_ featureful package managers. They have many nice capabilities, a higher degree of logging, etc. However, they're complex and slow. From the UX side of things, RHEL-like distro's seem to put the most focus on ease of use/vring a complete system out of the box. Arch/Alpine focus on a being much lighter, in the UI, default packages, and distro config. I would probably classify Arch/Alpine as their own minimalist family of distro's