Right, I never claimed there are not tradeoffs.... I said it is a factor. As such, if you assert that my post said you can't do burns because of pollution, th

Right, I never claimed there are not tradeoffs.... I said it is a factor. As such, if you assert that my post said you can't do burns because of pollution, than you have strawmanned it to the weakest possible stance it could be, in spite of my clearly stating that is not my stance. I have literally said the opposite of that, in this very thread. More, it has not been established that it is too far into the "no pollution side at all." Do you have evidence that it is pollution regulation that has caused no controlled burns? Noting that I can bring up plenty of easy evidence of folks literally doing small scale controlled burns. I don't think you all are doing it on purpose, but this is a dog whistle tactic to pull in a lot of anti regulation folks to yell about things.