OceanGate vs Lochridge [0] is an interesting lawsuit which may interest some of the readers here. It doesn't matter into which page you scroll, all things you

OceanGate vs Lochridge [0] is an interesting lawsuit which may interest some of the readers here. It doesn't matter into which page you scroll, all things you get to read are related to concerns of the security of the sub. Ok, it basically starts at page 9, all before it is legalese bootstrapping. > Defendant David Lochridge has extensive background as a submarine pilot and training of the same [...] Underwater Inspector, and trained to recognize flaw and points out failure in subsea equipment > May 2015 [...] began working with OceanGate as an independent contractor > As a part of his job duties, Lochridge was the Director of Marine Operations and was tasked with "ensuring the safety of all crew and clients during submesible and surface operations." > Issues of quality control with the new submersible Titan were raised, as there were evident flaws throughout the build process [...] > Lochridge worked on his report and requested paperword [...] was met with hostility and denial of access to the necessary documentation. > Lochridge first expressed verbal concerns over the safety and quality control issues regarding the Titan to OceanGate executive management. These verbal communications were ignored. And so on. [0] https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23854184-oceangate-v-david-lochridge https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23854184-oceangate-v...