3 ms·
I think a smaller N number of more dives would yield better results. Down, up, down up...repeat until failure. In parallel do it with another hull at the same
by rossjudson 3y ago
I think a smaller N number of more dives would yield better results. Down, up, down up...repeat until failure.
In parallel do it with another hull at the same time. Or maybe more than one. Compare.
Testing to failure is a nice option because it finds certain types of unwelcome surprises.
But it's not really complete, either -- there are probably a lot of ways that a submersible can be compromised, and there's no way to be sure what caused this particular failure.
- cbzoiav 3y agoThe debris may yield significant clues. Those may then be able to be validated with independent testing rather than requiring a full vehicle.