To be clear, I'm talking about the following: I can write some code or use modules written in JavaScript that compile to WASM. I can use that compiled output w

To be clear, I'm talking about the following: I can write some code or use modules written in JavaScript that compile to WASM. I can use that compiled output with any runtime that can import WASM and expose its interface natively. To that end, I could use it in Rust, no problem. The same is in reverse. I can write a Rust program, compile to WASM, and use it in JS runtime (lots of projects do this already, actually. esbuild does this with Go as well). Right Now there are of course limitations, however if current trajectory holds, you'll be able to just import wasm directly into a compat runtime. So I can take the JS to WASM output and share it to any language to can understand it. This is, as I understand it, the advantage of WASM in the future tense (and if you use JavaScript, its kind of present tense, esp. with import assertions)