> I'm shocked this isn't being done already. What's more shocking is why it wasn't being done. > Why not talk about more concrete reasons that controlled burn

> I'm shocked this isn't being done already. What's more shocking is why it wasn't being done. > Why not talk about more concrete reasons that controlled burns are good without appealing to it being opposite of racists? We are talking concrete reasons. We have to first understand the concrete reasons why it wasn't being done already first. You yourself said it is shocking. Don't you want to know why? What were the reasons against controlled burn? Then we can figure out if we should do it. Just because the concrete reasons upset you doesn't mean they aren't worthy of being discussed. There are many things to be upset about. I don't think controlled burns are it.