4 ms·
Yes. Another way of stating that is that all professions (aside from math-based ones) are inconsistent at some level of detail and have various workarounds for
by DanielBMarkham 3y ago
Yes.
Another way of stating that is that all professions (aside from math-based ones) are inconsistent at some level of detail and have various workarounds for that.
Even accountants are paid to give "accounting opinions" about the various legalities and appropriate nature of the books. Looking across a bunch of domains, once you get people involved, around the edges of the problem domain accumulates a lot of fluff that for throughout history didn't matter. It still might not matter. Or maybe it does. We're the first to spot it.
- Verdex 3y agoFrom what I can see, I agree with your point here. I've had a parallel thought for a few years now. Historically, if you wanted something done and you weren't going to do it yourself, you needed to find someone else to do it for you. Imprinting the exact specification of what you wanted them to do is impossible, so you give them some highlights, explain some edge cases, and make sure they understand the high level and off they go to do ... something. They'll figure it out I'm sure. For simple work, anyone would do. For complex work, it pays to have hard nosed managers with good memories who aren't afraid to yell at people 'slacking off'. And for the truly difficult work you need aged experts who trained under the best for decades and have practiced for decades more (and who have their own students following them wherever they went). So we have all sorts of skills and traditions for explaining to people what we want to happen. Explaining to a box of sand and copper on the other hand .... exposes some logical flaws that simply did not exist before.