4 ms·
That's true, during the time I had a 486 SX 33 with 4 MB and 200 MB HDD. Windows 3.1 ran fine, I tried OS/2 Warp and it was unbearably slow. Never tested Window
by blablabla123 3y ago
That's true, during the time I had a 486 SX 33 with 4 MB and 200 MB HDD. Windows 3.1 ran fine, I tried OS/2 Warp and it was unbearably slow. Never tested Windows 95 on that computer but of course NT was completely out-of-reach. On the other hand "NT" was unusable for anything fun until XP.
Still, there's a point to make about bloat but the comparison seems to be between Apples and Oranges
- anthk 3y agoWindows 2000 used to run lots of games. Also, you have a compat mode for w95/98 a la Windows XP prompt, but only for desktop shortcuts.