3 ms·
I think a lot of your general practitioners are bound to follow protocol set forth by various medical organizations. So in that sense a lot of diving into resea
by gautamdivgi 3y ago
I think a lot of your general practitioners are bound to follow protocol set forth by various medical organizations. So in that sense a lot of diving into research won’t help them. They need to understand and diagnose without having to worry about every little research paper. A lot of research papers aren’t truth - they are peer reviewed opinions.
Once you get to medical research groups that formulate those protocols, that’s where research becomes important.
- hospitalJail 3y ago>I think a lot of your general practitioners are bound to follow protocol set forth by various medical organizations. So in that sense a lot of diving into research won’t help them. They need to understand and diagnose without having to worry about every little research paper. A lot of research papers aren’t truth - they are peer reviewed opinions. Isnt this even more necessary for them to learn the fundementals? Especially if Physicians claim that they are both Art and Science, which is why we can't merely use science for diagnosis and treatment.
- gautamdivgi 3y agoThat’s why diving into research will not help general practitioners. Because research isn’t fact. You need a body of research along with oversight of statistical methods and its data collection to claim fact and that too with specific constraints. So they do learn fundamentals but fundamentals do not come out of research papers.