Here’s a longer video with more explanation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=ygUOQ2hhdGdwdCBsYXd5ZXI%3D https://youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=yg

Here’s a longer video with more explanation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=ygUOQ2hhdGdwdCBsYXd5ZXI%3D https://youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=ygUOQ2hhdGdwdCBsY... At first it was just generated citations. The opposing lawyers and judges could not find the cases, and so they then asked chatGPT for them, and it generated them, and they were submitted to the court. (One of the lawyers notarized the other’s filings.) There are even transcripts of chatGPT telling the accused that it is not an authoritative or up-to-date legal database. —- The punishment could arguably be more severe, since it demonstrated that these lawyers do not read their cases, particularly the one that notarized everything.