This reads like a spoilt child. If his claims about copyright are true (and I am not a lawyer but my understanding is that there are several high profile cases

This reads like a spoilt child. If his claims about copyright are true (and I am not a lawyer but my understanding is that there are several high profile cases in progress about exactly this ,at least for code and art) then there is no need for his license - he can just sue under existing copyright laws. I don't believe any major legal system world wide currently has the concept of people being able to decide their own damages up front.