3 ms·
What a poor take. Tyson talks about science, and works to popularize it. The better analogy here would be after a space shuttle accident they ask a former NASA
by ctvo 3y ago
What a poor take.
Tyson talks about science, and works to popularize it. The better analogy here would be after a space shuttle accident they ask a former NASA astronaut for their opinion and to share their own personal experience traveling to space.
From Wikipedia:
In 2011, Cameron became a National Geographic explorer-in-residence.[132] In his role on March 7, 2012, he dived five miles deep to the bottom of the New Britain Trench with the Deepsea Challenger.[133] 19 days later, Cameron reached the Challenger Deep, the deepest part of the Mariana Trench.[134][135][136] He spent more than three hours exploring the ocean floor, becoming the first to accomplish the trip alone.[134][137]
- mwbajor 3y agoThat hardly makes him an expert on submersible construction when there are others out there albeit few, that have this experience. The parent comment was on submersible construction expertise of which Cameron has little to none. I'd agree that he has piloting expertise (and definitely unique experience ). Again, whats his naval engineering resume like? How many submersibles or submersible subsystems has he designed? The thing he does have is a good team that he probably listens to of which stockton rush did not have. He's relatable though and has strong opinions which make for more clicks.