4 ms·
I unironically have no issue with racists being locked out of their homes. Perhaps with the doorbell robot giving them sarcastic responses to their pleas.
by optimalsolver 3y ago
I unironically have no issue with racists being locked out of their homes. Perhaps with the doorbell robot giving them sarcastic responses to their pleas.
- thrw_aus 3y agoYou're the best person in this thread. Of course you have to clarify that you mean white racists, because you'd be the most racist person in this thread if you meant the 33% of blacks who want miscegenation to be banned again: https://i.redd.it/fwgz4oyty85b1.png https://i.redd.it/fwgz4oyty85b1.png I guess we should burn your house down just in case.
- sebzim4500 3y agoInteresting. Is there equivalent data on the question "should two people of different races be allowed to marry?". Seems more relevant than the question asked, which is arguably about states rights.
- optimalsolver 3y agoI think we've had our fill of "states rights".
- thrw_aus 3y agoYes California must be crushed under the Unions boots for flaunting federal laws on drugs for decades.
- lom888 3y agoIn your opinion, do they have to say a racism or merely think it to be worthy of being locked out of their home?
- optimalsolver 3y agoHmmm. Tough one. I think making certain expressions in the presence of black people should be enough to qualify.
- jaywalk 3y agoSay the rest, which is that it has to be a white person doing it. Because obviously a black person "making certain expressions in the presence of black people" is no problem at all. So you want white people to lose their house if they hurt a black person's feelings. Totally legitimate position, not insane at all.
- Slava_Propanei 3y ago[dead]
- pierat 3y agoI heard from someone you said a racist word. I advocate for you to be locked out of all your stuff, with no trial or anything.