5 ms·
Playing devil‘s advocate, all kinds of linting, vetting or security scanning with any degree of smartness beyond a regex would probably fall into my definition
by endymi0n 3y ago
Playing devil‘s advocate, all kinds of linting, vetting or security scanning with any degree of smartness beyond a regex would probably fall into my definition of non-human eyes too.
Slippery slope, yes, but in reality there is a legal framework and a ToS in place as well.
- JohnFen 3y ago> in reality there is a legal framework and a ToS in place as well. That doesn't give a lot of comfort. ToS can change at any time.
- skydhash 3y agoThese tools are enabled by the owner of the repository. And I think consent has precedence over license terms. But this seems like an escape hatch for using your code as a training material.
- rany_ 3y agoAlso dependency graph is enabled by default. So there's that.
- sheepscreek 3y agoThis. I believe the title of this post is a click bait, and doesn’t include the context of this verbiage. Use of data for AI training is a big deal. Implicitly allowing it under this definition will be enough cause for a lawsuit.
- Mystery-Machine 3y agoIf it doesn't explicitly say: we do not use private repos data to train our AI models, I wouldn't even consider assuming any other way than that's exactly what they are doing. They know this is a question everyone wants to know the answer to. Why would they leave any ambiguity? Let me help you answer that: because that's exactly what they are doing.