3 ms·

Again, accidents happen, but if you are the catalyst over and over again it's on you. > This seems objectively reductive and represents ideological beliefs as

• mistermann 3y ago
  > Again, accidents happen, but if you are the catalyst over and over again it's on you. Technically, it "is on" whoever objectively plays a role in the underlying causality. You "may" be referring to your perception of what is going on, as opposed to what is actually going on (which is unreachable). >> This seems objectively reductive and represents ideological beliefs as objective facts. > No, you just didn't liked that thing you like got attacked for the thing they did and are making up excuses. Except I have the ability to describe the various ways in which it is (at least plausibly) objectively reductive and represents ideological beliefs as objective facts, whereas you have a much harder problem: proving that you can actually read my mind (or, are omniscient).
• froggit 3y ago
  > Again, accidents happen, but if you are the catalyst over and over again it's on you. Yeah, they "accidentally" carried swords, firebombs and molotov cocktails to a protest. It was an honest mistake, right? I mean, those are normal things people carry around on a daily basis, aren't they?