> Every novel story created by a human is a story that ChatGPT has yet to learn. And every story told by ChatGPT is potential raw material for humans to tell a

> Every novel story created by a human is a story that ChatGPT has yet to learn. And every story told by ChatGPT is potential raw material for humans to tell a new, novel story. We’re one step ahead by definition. Only if you phrase it like that. What about this: "Every novel story created by ChatGPT is a story that humans have yet to learn. And every story told by humans is potential raw material for ChatGPT to tell a new, novel story. ChatGPT is one step ahead by definition." I don't think it's obvious that either humans or AIs are one step ahead of the other, they're both swirling together in one big pot of culture.