4 ms·
Whenever something like this happens it's worth looking at the entire scope, this is not as simple as Amazon banning the guy. You need to look at the steps that
by curiousgal 3y ago
Whenever something like this happens it's worth looking at the entire scope, this is not as simple as Amazon banning the guy. You need to look at the steps that took place, someone had to actually make the call and have him banned. There was probably an email chain and this was the decision that they arrived to. Linking shitty things that happen to a person rather than some abstract corp gives the right perspective. Evil.
- mozman 3y agoThe worst part is the decision was made without proof. As distasteful or offensive as it was alleged to be its still just words. Who cares.
- curiousgal 3y agoProof of what? I didn't even consider that the allegation had an iota of truth!
- username332211 3y agoThat the decision was made without proof is the best, not the worst part of the whole affair. If there was one iota of proof, half the people on the internet would be arguing how it's Amazon's right and duty to brick people's homes if they say the bad word. None of them realizing that once such precedent is established, the Amazon corporation will be using and abusing it to it's own advantage. Such non-immediate concerns are beyond half the people in the internet, who lack the ability to project the future more a year ahead.
- stuaxo 3y agoYep - we should never ever forget that companies are just groups of people who make decisions, and they should be accountable.
- JohnFen 3y agoA huge part of the entire point of corporations is to keep individuals from being held accountable.