3 ms·
So the bill doesn't say that Canadians will no longer have access to news content on Facebook & Instagram. The bill says that tech giants need to pay to post ne
by WirelessGigabit 3y ago
So the bill doesn't say that Canadians will no longer have access to news content on Facebook & Instagram.
The bill says that tech giants need to pay to post news content on their own website.
However, the giants then give a giant middle finger to the news outlets.
Full disclosure: I hate <please accept our cookies> News outlets <please provide your email address for our newsletter> and the way they <you have reached 5/5 articles this month, click here to get a subscription>.
*WirelessGigabit navigates to archive.is/link_to_article
... try to do everything to NOT focus on the article they just wrote...
But, looking at the history, I'm sure it'll play out like this:
* News outlet has website, gets visitors.
* Facebook comes along, gets many visitors.
* News outlet posts content on Facebook for exposure.
* News outlet gets visitors via Facebook and makes money on advertisement revenue.
* Facebook starts to things to keep people in their ecosystem.
* News outlet gets no visitors as everybody considers Facebook their 'entrypoint' to the WWW.
* New bill gets lobbied that force tech giants need to pay to post news.
* Tech giants don't post news.
* News outlet still doesn't get visitors.
- subarctic 3y ago> So the bill doesn't say that Canadians will no longer have access to news content on Facebook & Instagram. The bill says that tech giants need to pay to post news content on their own website. Who's the one posting the news in this case? You make it sound like Facebook is taking their content and posting it for them, but the way I'm interpreting it is, those outlets are posting to Facebook of their own volition and with this bill, Facebook would have to pay The Globe and Mail whenever The Globe and Mail posts content to Facebook. Am I reading it wrong?