Most cable modem users in north america are in the same situation. And small shops usually have a business package with a static IP too. I don't understand the

Most cable modem users in north america are in the same situation. And small shops usually have a business package with a static IP too. I don't understand the point keyboard warriors who insist IP doesn't identify a person and IP isn't PII are trying to make. Are they just being pedantic? Because yes, often an IP is shared. Yes, obviously the legal system shouldn't assume a IP equals a person. That would be very problematic. But when it comes to mere tracking, an IP can absolutely identify directly a person. So why not just treat it as such all the time? What's the downside of considering IP to be PII?