3 ms·
For all of the campaign's faults, the Clinton 2016 design and web teams did a fantastic job. https://www.hillaryforamericadesign.com/work https://www.hillaryfo
by sbdaman 3y ago
For all of the campaign's faults, the Clinton 2016 design and web teams did a fantastic job.
https://www.hillaryforamericadesign.com/work https://www.hillaryforamericadesign.com/work
- qingcharles 3y agoIt's modern and bold, it's just got a lot going on. It's hard to know what the hell to click on.
- sbdaman 3y agoThe archive site isn’t great for usability but the 2016 campaign site seems fine to me.
- DiabloD3 3y agoThis is awful design, though. How am I supposed to find what I want to click on with that page without hovering over everything? Not only that, that page is from 2016, the "young voters" already had phones by that point... how are you supposed to hover on a phone? (I assume the phone experience is entirely different here, fwiw). This reminds me a lot of toy websites I made in the early to mid 2000s when I didn't care about accessibility or usability or discoverability, and made stuff that looked cool for the sake of cool. I cringe at those things I made when I didn't know better.
- sbdaman 3y agoIt seems like you’re focused on the archive site, which I agree isn’t great for usability.