4 ms·
For emails in the cloud, and probably other data, they don't need a warrant if it's 6 months or older anyways. So they probably can force them to give it out fo
by activiation 3y ago
For emails in the cloud, and probably other data, they don't need a warrant if it's 6 months or older anyways. So they probably can force them to give it out for free. But either way they have a black budget so we are fucked in many ways.
https://emailserverprovider.com/emails-texts-documents-older-than-6-months-no-warrant-needed-to-read-if-stored-on-remote-server-aka-the-cloud/ https://emailserverprovider.com/emails-texts-documents-older...
- qingcharles 3y agoIt's no longer that black and white since US v. Carpenter. It needs someone to try it again. In that case SCOTUS did cite Warshak[1], which while not binding over the whole nation, is persuasive and clearly the older 2018 SCOTUS showed their potential interest in ending the Third Party Doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine [1] https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2010/12/17/court-finds-fourth-amendment-protects-email-privacy/ https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2010/12/17/court-finds-fou...
- activiation 3y agoThat's good to hear