4 ms·
Your comment seems to have nothing to do with the OP. It starts with "In my career as a psychologist..." so it's not like he's trying to tar all psychological
by Estragon 15y ago
Your comment seems to have nothing to do with the OP. It starts with "In my career as a psychologist..." so it's not like he's trying to tar all psychological treatment with the one brush. He's specifically talking about a tendency to use psychological diagnosis as a tool to dominate and marginalize resistance to established norms. You can still see value in psychological treatment even if you stipulate that it's sometimes used as a tool for domination. E.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madness_and_Civilization#Impact http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madness_and_Civilization#Impact
- smokeyj 15y agoExactly, why is a wall of text that addresses no ones concern the top comment? Who here was attacking psychology as a whole? The article made some great points that should have opened the conversation to what constitutes authority and why we're drugging those who don't fit in.