4 ms·

Someone already did: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32498435 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32498435 Overall the timeline doesn't seem implausible

• lolinder 3y ago
  Okay, I'll amend my statement: no one should be using a WASM-powered Postgres as their production DB. Right now compiling to WASM is sort of the equivalent of "but will it run Doom?" People are doing it for everything, and it's a fun experiment to stretch WASM. I could see it being useful in making some things available in the browser that otherwise couldn't be. But that doesn't mean it's going to replace containers in their rightful place. It'll be another option, and unless you're trying to solve one of the few problems that WASM was designed to solve (like running in the browser), it will be the wrong one.
  • moonchrome 3y ago
    > Okay, I'll amend my statement: no one should be using a WASM-powered Postgres as their production DB. Realistically containers neither. DBs are infrastructure best left to PaaS or dedicated VMs you can provision/manage better.